Possible errors in manual performance management

  Reading Time:

Managers will be those who bring the company’s culture and values to the workforce and pursue an individual’s career before them. They will be part of it, perhaps even the reason.

Executives and employees often fear performance evaluations. This is partly because many tests are ineffective and unnecessary because they have problems such as unconscious bias, not using a baseline when writing a test, unnecessary emphasis on personality traits and not providing instructions or support to an employee to improve the situation.

With the right performance management process, employees should feel fulfilled because they are informed of their strengths, aware of their weaknesses and have goals they must achieve to improve their own performance. They should leave the review meetings with a new purpose and an idea of how their hard work will help the company.

But there are parts of the administration that may not be as pleasant — such as performance management. Many managers are not well trained to manage a variety of emotions when performance evaluation goes wrong. This will only lead to a more negative relationship between managers and employees. Executives and employees can feel anxious and very tense. Employees perceive performance appraisal as a form of punishment.

Many HR managers or managers do not understand that each employee’s performance objectives should at least be aligned with departmental objectives and thus contribute to the success of the business. Companies are still creating performance management with the One Size fits All approach, which is the main reason why annual evaluation is ineffective. Different interpretations of an employee’s rating scale and performance level make the process subjective. The use of a rating system creates an illusion of objectivity and employee motivation decreases when their contribution is quantified.

Below are some of the most common errors in performance management;

1. Your performance management process does not focus on employee development

The biggest problem with performance reviews is that a session can quickly become personal. They are beginning to assess employee characteristics and behaviors, rather than areas for improvement. Performance management should provide employees with development tools to help them grow and progress in their careers, although this does not necessarily mean that their professional role should be promoted or expanded.

Development tools can be technical or non-technical training, on-site training, cross-exposure with other government departments, role postings, etc.

2. There is no review of employee performance that is frequently performed

Regular communication is positively associated with employee engagement. In fact, employees whose managers conduct regular reviews with them are much more effective than those whose managers do not. A survey conducted by Jeff Fermin, founder of office vibe, found that the overall turnover rate of companies that provide regular feedback is 15% lower.

How can this be achieved? Managers can be reminded to check with employees by reminding them of their telephone, e-mail or even their personnel management system. Individual interactions with employees will give a strong boost to engagement.

Engaging your employees can be as simple as approaching them as often as possible to feel the breeze. It can take place between two months, three months or even every two years.

3. The job is not finished

A perfect evaluation method and a clear list of targets mean nothing if you don’t do it. Check with employees throughout the year to ensure that milestones are being met. If development plans are developed during the evaluation, ensure that there are measurable opportunities for managers and employees to monitor the process and progress throughout the year. If rewards are promised during the exam, make sure they are delivered on time.

4. Influence of the Halo effect bias

The halo effect is a particular bias that can bias your assessments and make them more positive than they should be. With the halo effect, the employee has a particular characteristic or area of performance that you find particularly attractive, which affects the way you perceive every aspect of the worker’s performance.

For example, if you have an employee who is an excellent researcher and who develops reports that contain accurate and timely information, you may be inclined to consider the employee’s performance in other areas more favorably, even if the evidence shows that skills in these other areas are not as strong.

5. Focus on a single disability

Concentrating too much on a deficiency is the opposite of the halo effect. Some employees may experience difficulties in a particular area, even if their performance in other tasks is good or even excellent. Don’t overlook behaviors or skills that need improvement, but don’t let your frustration push you to ignore or minimize everything the employee does correctly.

6. Ignore the entire timeline

Performance evaluations usually focus on a specific time period, usually last year. Unfortunately, some managers tend to concentrate on the most recent weeks and months, ignoring performance throughout the year. Another mistake is to focus too much on a single situation or project rather than looking at overall employee performance.

7. Unawareness of Negative Biases

Everyone is prejudiced, and many of them may be unconscious. Employers and managers should control bias in performance evaluations. Generally, biases develop based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or aspects of an employee’s appearance.

Before offering a test that could have a serious impact on an employee’s career path, the person conducting the test should make a personal reflection to examine any possible bias. Would the same report be given to an employee whose personal characteristics are different from those of the employee in question?

8. Lack of a professional development plan

Most employees strive to improve their skills and move to more challenging positions that offer better compensation. Sometimes, however, managers focus entirely on the employee’s performance in his or her current position, leading to a missed opportunity. The employee misses opportunities for professional growth and the employer does not exploit the employee’s potential.

8. Listening failure

Annual performance evaluation is not an opportunity for catharsis in management. While the employee is being reviewed, the manager must assume some responsibility for the employee’s performance. Managers should listen carefully and take into account the employee’s explanations, concerns, and comments.

Remember that performance appraisal provides an overview of past performance and provides an excellent opportunity to set the course for improving employee performance and satisfaction. Without a plan and effective implementation of these plans, everything is lost and you will have lost time.

In addition, it provides a valuable opportunity to focus on work activities and objectives, identify and resolve existing problems and promote better future performance. Then, the performance of the whole is increased by a multiple of the individual effect.

Performance management reflects the ongoing nature of employee performance improvement and development and recognizes the importance of effective management, work systems, and team contributions. If performance management is properly implemented and specific objectives are linked to the strategic and operational plan, organizational performance results are likely to increase rapidly.

Looking for an automated Performance Management system, we suggest you IceHrmwhich is one of the best HRIS systems which has so many HR functions automated into one system.

IceHrm is a Human resource management system for small and medium-sized organizations. This HRM software centralizes employee data and allows only one authorized person to access it, providing a high level of security. The presence module monitors employee time based on information about insertion and perforation. It covers all the basic HRM needs of a company such as Time Management, Attendance Management, Expense management, leave management, Recruitment management and handling employee information.

Key Features of IceHrm

Payroll Management
Time & Attendance Management
Document Management
Employee Self Service Management
Performance Management
Performance Appraisal
Benefits Management
Attendance management
Email Integration
Project Management
Workflow Management
Dashboard
Employee Lifecycle Management

Unlike the other popular HRM software, you can use one system for all HRM functions. As the other HRM software tools are designed for specific HRM functions separately, using IceHrm will benefit you to utilize all HRM functions in one software. There are three different editions in IceHrm. Each edition has different features. You have a choice to select which edition will suit your organization according to your HR requirements in the organization. Also, you can purchase the IceHrm software based on the number of employees in your organization.

Mistakes in Human Resource Management

Your HR staff is responsible for a number of tasks and their effective management can be overwhelming. But they are still human, and that means mistakes...

Most common difficulties in calculating payroll manually

We know how much this can be painful for an organization's human resources and finance teams. It takes a lot of hard work, time and dedicated...

IceHrm   Create your IceHrm, installation today.