Start Free Trial
← All articles

Key Anti-Discrimination Laws for Recruiters

Learn key anti-discrimination laws in hiring, essential for HR managers to avoid legal issues. Stay compliant, protect your company.

IceHrm Blog8 min read

Compliance with anti-discrimination laws in hiring protects recruiters, human resources managers and employers from costly lawsuits and legal fees associated with discriminatory hiring practices.

In 2022, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission received 73,485 complaints about race, gender, age, religion, disability, color and national origin.

Most important laws against discrimination in hiring

1.ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS IN RECRUITMENT: THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 (CRA)

This is a landmark law that prohibits discrimination against applicants based on protected characteristics, such as:

When hiring, this law requires HR managers to:

2.ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS IN RECRUITMENT: AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT (1975)

This federal law prohibits discrimination in hiring against individuals age 40 or older.

When hiring, this law requires HR managers to do the following

3.ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS IN HIRING: AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)

This federal law prohibits discrimination against applicants with disabilities.

The ADA protects individuals with physical or mental impairments that significantly limit their major life activities, such as seeing, speaking, hearing, or walking. The law also applies to people who have had an impairment in the past or who are perceived to have such an impairment.

This law obliges human resources managers to:

4.ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS IN RECRUITMENT: PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION ACT

This federal law prohibits companies from discriminating against applicants based on pregnancy, childbirth and/or related medical conditions. Employers may not reject applicants because they are pregnant, have recently given birth or may become pregnant.

When hiring, HR managers are obliged under this law to:

5.ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS IN RECRUITMENT: GENETIC INFORMATION NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT OF 2008

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) protects people from discrimination based on their genetic information in various areas, including employment.

GINA defines genetic information as:

When hiring, this law obliges HR managers to:

6.ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS IN RECRUITMENT: EQUAL PAY ACT 1963

The Equal Pay Act of 1963 ensures that men and women who do similar work in the same place are paid equally. Therefore, if the work requires the same skills, effort, responsibilities and performance under similar conditions, both genders should be paid equally.

Although this law does not apply directly to the hiring process, HR professionals should be aware of its impact on wage discrimination in hiring and throughout the employment relationship:

Bona Fide Professional Qualifications (BFOQs)

BFOQs are narrowly defined characteristics that are essential to the job and cannot be met by someone with another characteristic. They must therefore be directly related to the tasks and performance of the position and must not be based on stereotypes or assumptions.

BFOQs are legal exceptions to workplace anti-discrimination laws. However, they are not a license for free discrimination. They are a very narrow exception and require compelling justification.

Examples of possible BFOQs:

Employers must seek legal advice to ensure that their BFOQ claims are valid and consistent with applicable laws, and if there are any questions or concerns about BFOQs or anti-discrimination practices.

In addition, they should consider other ways to achieve legitimate work objectives without invoking protected characteristics. This could include changing work tasks, training employees or using alternative selection criteria. They should also always prioritize anti-discrimination principles and strive for fair and inclusive hiring practices.

Penalties and consequences for failing to comply with anti-discrimination laws when hiring

COMPANIES THAT HAD TO FACE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES DUE TO DISCRIMINATIVE HIRING PRACTICES

Amazon

Former manager Lisa McCarrick was asked by her boss to review applicants' social media profiles to determine their gender and race. She was aware that Amazon was being criticized for its lack of diversity in the workplace and believed what was being asked of her was illegal.

McCarrick sued Amazon, alleging she was illegally terminated when she complained about this job. The lawsuit alleges that while she consistently received positive performance reviews during her employment at Amazon, she was told the reason for her termination was because she "failed to meet expectations."

Facebook

Applicants Howard Winns Jr. and Jazsmin Smith filed a lawsuit with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission accusing Facebook of racial discrimination in hiring black applicants. They claimed they were rejected for jobs despite being "well qualified" and having recommendations from a current Facebook employee.

Similarly, former recruiter Anastasia Boone Talton filed a $100 million lawsuit against Facebook. She claims that the social media company only paid "lip service" to its diversity goals and flew applicants to the company's headquarters for interviews just to meet a quota without actually hiring them.

Tips for complying with anti-discrimination laws when hiring

For more information, see a list of offensive (exclusionary) words in job descriptions.

Understanding and adhering to anti-discrimination laws in hiring is paramount. Stay compliant and streamline HR processes with IceHrm.